Nonviolence: Twenty-five Lessons from the History of a Dangerous Idea
by Mark Kurlansky
Foreword by His Holiness the Dalai Lama
The Modern Library / 2006
Review by Charles Scriven
This excellent overview was written for a general audience and recently won the Dayton Literary Peace Prize (at an event where Elie Wiesel was honored for lifetime achievement as a peace activist).
Mark Kurlansky underlines from start to finish his conviction that nonviolence is a form of activism. It is both a “means of persuasion” and a “recipe for prevailing.” He fully understands that Jesus was the “first prominent example” of a rebel who rejected “violence in all its forms.” He also understands, however, that when Constantine “empowered the Church as an instrument of statecraft,” the result was disastrous. Christianity is thus at once a key influence for good and a key betrayer of that good. And as Jesus is the key champion of that good, Pope Urban II, with his call to holy war against Islam in 1095, is the key betrayer, or one of them. His speech at Clermont contained, Kurlansky says, “all the traditional lies by which people are convinced to die and kill.”
Kurlansky’s account considers all the most prominent world religions, and in the end he makes clear his conviction that the connection between states and religious communities is deeply compromising for religion in general. All the great religions, he argues, have been “defiled and disgraced in the hands of nation-states.”
Kurlansky’s story covers both nonviolence and the religious sanctioning of violence. Along the way many stories illuminate the larger points. To take just one, he writes about how Bayard Rustin, the young black Quaker, co-founder of CORE (the Congress of Racial Equality) and mentor to Martin Luther King, marched against the Korean War in 1951. During that march he “was attacked with a stick by an angry spectator. Rustin handed him a second stick and asked him if he wanted to use both. The attacker threw both sticks down.”
Kurlansky, like Christian theologians in the Walter Wink or John Howard Yoder mold, would dismiss the idea that Jesus’ admonition to turn the other cheek (Matthew 5:39) is worthless passivity. The Rustin story is well nigh perfect for illustrating the point.
In all, the author suggests, as his subtitle says, 25 lessons from the history of nonviolence. Some reflect, for example, the heroic witness of Mahatma Gandhi, whom he greatly admires. So this is not a work of exclusive Christian theology. But it is, certainly, a work of hope.
Kurlansky notes well the continuing allure of violence. But if the twentieth century saw the most die in war of any century, it also saw the most successes for nonviolent activism. He looks at several of the 1989 bloodless revolutions in Eastern Europe. He remarks on how the Vietnam War, for leaving Americans too ashamed to celebrate what they had done, opened the door to more truthful reflection on war’s reality and impact. So even though Kurlansky does not write (as far as I can tell) from an explicitly Christian perspective, he nevertheless makes a telling case for the radical perspective on Christian peacemaking.
And these days, of course, no case is more important.
--Charles Scriven is President of the Kettering College of Medical Arts near Dayton, Ohio, and an Adventist Peace Fellowship advisor.
Recent Comments